## A Look Back at the Gambling Act Review White Paper: One Year On
It’s been nearly twelve months since the substantial Gambling Act Review White Paper was published. This document was intended to completely transform the way gambling is regulated in the UK. It was a significant event, promising a fresh approach to the industry. But has it truly improved the situation?
**A Year of Transformation**
The White Paper was finally unveiled in April after a lengthy period of anticipation, debate, and resistance from the gambling sector. It’s a comprehensive document, spanning over 200 pages, filled with innovative proposals for how gambling should operate. Some are minor adjustments, while others are substantial changes that could fundamentally alter the industry.
The White Paper has already had a considerable impact on all facets of the gambling landscape. Online casinos, traditional casinos, and horse racing have all been affected.
The UK Gambling Commission has been actively implementing the White Paper’s recommendations. They initiated discussions with stakeholders in July, focusing on enhancing gambling safety and sustainability. One of the most significant changes they’re considering is requiring individuals to demonstrate their financial capacity to gamble, a major development.
In the days following the publication of the official document, Tim Miller, the head of research and policy at the Commission, acknowledged that authorities would have limited flexibility to explore alternative approaches in the years ahead. What advancements have been made in implementing the document’s suggestions for safer gambling and long-term viability over the past year?
The connection between gaming providers and participants is a crucial factor in industry expansion, just as finance is the driving force behind global progress. Any disruption to this connection could lead to severe repercussions, so it should be handled with caution.
The official document is a document that could easily lead to these repercussions. Victoria Reed, the founder of Better Change, believes that the industry’s regulatory standards are already stringent, but she emphasizes the need for a balanced approach when introducing stricter rules.
“This is an industry that is already subject to extensive regulation, so I believe the standards are generally high compared to other sectors,” Reed stated. “However, the nature of our business is heavily influenced by technological advancements and customer preferences, so we can never become complacent and assume we have all the answers.”
This equilibrium is particularly critical when it comes to ensuring sustainable gaming.
Numerous internet service providers have implemented supplementary safeguards for individuals aged 18 to 24, and some even conduct financial assessments when concerns arise, Reed stated. Some regulation of these measures is advisable, but it’s crucial to achieve a suitable equilibrium between individual liberty of choice and governmental intervention for the common good.
Matt Zab-Kusin, co-founder and director of external affairs at Gamban, asserted that this alteration in how service providers interact with their clientele will benefit both players and the providers themselves. He anticipates that operators will thrive under more stringent regulations, with sustainability becoming their paramount priority.
“I believe that certain proposals outlined in the white paper will fundamentally transform the dynamic between operators and their patrons, and consequently, I anticipate that operators will need to modify their operational practices and public perception,” he elaborated.
“Within a framework characterized by elevated standards, operators who derive less revenue from individuals grappling with gambling issues will be the ones that endure.”
Reed advocates for a proactive approach to enhancing the sustainability and safety of gambling by preemptively addressing potential problems. She contends that the white paper falls short in this domain.
“Our perspective is that ‘safer gambling’ signifies gambling responsibly.”
Thus, restricting, limiting, prohibiting, blocking, or even branding gambling as undesirable has no place in responsible gambling,” she stated. “Therefore, we see very little in the white paper that constitutes responsible gambling – instead, we believe measures like limits and financial risk assessments are more aligned with player protection.
“Naturally, this is significant, and we believe there should be ample resources for those who have encountered gambling harm, but our role is not to rescue people from the river, it’s to prevent them from falling in in the first place.”
Financial assessments are the industry’s primary concern.
Better Change’s ideology centers around supporting positive gaming through education and reform. This is to reach players before they might begin struggling. Aspects highlighted in the white paper, such as financial assessments, claim to want to achieve this.
If implemented appropriately, these proposals would tread a fine line – encouraging sustainable, safe levels of gambling before players reach a crisis point. This could be the solution to sustainability that the industry has been seeking.
If implemented in their current form, financial assessments would see those who lose £1,000 in a 24-hour period or £2,000 in 90 days face checks.
It’s difficult to overstate the strong opposition to financial assessments from much of the industry.
A request opposing the proposition collected one hundred thousand signatures and was sent to the legislature for debate in February of twenty twenty-four.
Although there is disagreement, Melanie Ellis, a gambling regulation attorney and partner at Northridge Law LLP, states that the affordability checks suggestions “represent a betterment of the current state.”
“There is a great deal of uncertainty among operators regarding the actions they should take to evaluate affordability and/or financial risk and when they should take these actions,” she said.
“However, we must recall that these suggestions are comparatively limited in range and will not simply replace existing operator procedures.”
Potential advantages for everyone
In the end, players engaging in unsafe gambling will diminish the likelihood of sustainable gaming, which will result in losses for both operators and players.
“The more you lose, the more likely you are to become dependent on gambling,” said Zarb-Cousin. “If there are systems in place to prevent harm, everyone gains.”
“Even the industry will gain, because you won’t end up with customers who lose all their money at once, exclude themselves, and never return.”
But implementing affordability checks could bring a variety of new unexpected difficulties. As the commission prepares to test affordability check programs, its impact may soon become clear.
Reid highlighted that cost-effectiveness should be implemented on a case-by-case basis.
“The financial risk evaluation structure must be individual-focused, not a universal approach,” she emphasized. “We must be cautious not to create a prejudice against betting while being indiscriminate about other recreational spending, resulting in an excessive stigmatization of our sector.
“This will affect commerce and will impede those who genuinely require assistance from receiving it.”
If implemented effectively, affordability checks – along with the proposed 1% legal tax on gross gambling revenue – could genuinely aid those who are harmed by gambling.
“If affordability checks are conducted properly, the tax will have a substantial impact,” Zab-Cusin stated. “The amount of money and resources that can be utilized for treatment and prevention activities – all of this will have a major impact.”
Guaranteeing future advancements
Significant progress has been made on the key suggestions outlined in the white paper over the past 12 months. But does this indicate that standards have improved?
Reid claims no. In fact, this may have negatively affected the commission’s ability to roll out research, education and treatment (RET) funding over the past year.
The ambiguity surrounding the suggested obligatory tax alterations has seriously affected the ventures presented by groups on the Gaming Commission’s authorized registry. These ventures are financed by voluntary contributions from the sector and are used for investigation, instruction, and treatment of gambling damage.
She highlighted the necessity for clarity on the specifics of the mandatory tax; otherwise, there would be even more losses in the coming year.
“The white paper has already had a considerable effect on our industry’s research, education, prevention, and treatment efforts. I am sorry to say that unless we address this, I do not believe we will see any improvement next year.”
Will the white paper aid in elevating standards?
In the meantime, Zab-Kusin hopes that some of the key components of the white paper will be put into practice in September or October of this year. He anticipates the affordability checks trial to conclude by then.
He is more hopeful that the new tax system could be implemented around this time next year. This would be a suitable time, marking the second anniversary of the white paper’s release.
For Ellis, the more contentious aspects of the white paper could cause players to turn to illicit market providers, which would be counterproductive to raising standards.
Certain concepts, such as wagering restrictions on virtual slot machines and regulations concerning bonuses, could potentially lead to an increase in individuals utilizing illicit gambling platforms. These unauthorized websites may lack mechanisms to assist users in managing their gaming habits or provide assistance in the event of difficulties, she stated.
The examination of the Gambling Act, in a sense, has yielded positive outcomes, even if it has merely initiated discussions regarding potential enhancements within the industry.
To ensure that the paper’s recommendations benefit both gambling enterprises and patrons, it is imperative to prioritize sustainability. Neglecting this aspect could result in the industry reverting to its previous state.
Subscribe to the iGaming News newsletter.